Advertisement
I have a smaller 6-gig drive upon which I wanted to run a legacy program. That legacy program wants DOS, native or that which is available under Win95 will do. I own licensed copies of both.
I used my boot disk for DOS 6.22 to start the computer (& not some boot disk from Win98 cause the dos is different and not downward compatible).
The drive got an FDISK and I formatted it.
When I try to load the Dos 6.22 ( not run but load) I get an error message that says that the program is too big for the memory.
That's not an accurate error message. The RAM memory is One Gig. So there's plenty. And it's only DOS 6.22. I used to run that on a 450 Meg hard drive with a whole Meg of memory . Woo Hoo~!!
While attempting to run ( after a successful load) Win95 I get an error message that says:
"Insufficient memory to initialize windows.
quit one or more memory resident programs or remove unnecessary utilities from your CONFIG.SYS and AUTOEXEC.BAT files, and restart your computer
Press any key to continue . . . "
And then the system shuts off when I hit any key.
There is no autoexec or config file. There is a COMMAND.COM file which I renamed to take it out of the loop. When I tried to re-boot after that, the system offered the "6 boot options" ranging from "SAFE MODE" to "SAFE MODE COMMAND PROMPT ONLY"
In SAFE MODE or BOOTLOGGED it presents me the same error message.
In BOOTLOGGED
It fails when I respond YES to the message:
"Load all Windows Drivers [Enter=Y, Esc=N] ?"
I am thinking that I may have a hardware problem.
Will DOS and Win95 run on a newer power supply type mother board? The type that shuts down based on a software command?
What are the RAM thresholds that may be difficult for DOS and Win95 to live with~? Should I yank a memory card?
Any ideas?
Advertisement
Advertisement
-
Re: Trying & failing to run legacy DOS or Win95
Mon, May 19, 2008 - 9:13 AMToo much RAM
blogs.msdn.com/oldnewthin.../54640.aspx
Windows 95 will fail to boot if you have more than around 480MB of memory. (This was considered an insane amount of memory back then. Remember, Windows 95's target machine was a 4MB 386SX and a powerful machine had 16MB. So according to Moore's law, that gave us seven years before we had to do something about it. One of my friends got 96MB of memory on his machine to test that we didn't tank under "insanely huge memory configurations" and we all drooled.) -
-
Re: Trying & failing to run legacy DOS or Win95
Tue, May 20, 2008 - 3:48 PMI am betting you are right. I should yank a chip and see what happens
-
-
Re: Trying & failing to run legacy DOS or Win95
Sun, June 1, 2008 - 5:59 AMIf it is lehgacy DOS, do you have enough of the right sort of memory; exteneded, expanded, etc? -
-
Re: Trying & failing to run legacy DOS or Win95
Tue, June 3, 2008 - 3:33 PMWell I can load it and run it. I tried pulling a memory chip and it made no difference. Apparently DOS 6.22 isn't disturbed by the excess memory it just ignores it .
However now I have another error.
I have my legacy software loaded but when I try to rune it I get an error that says something (un readable) about the pointer and closes the software without clearing the screen
I have been getting this error consistently on this mother board running DOS.
It's an ASUS AS333 that runs other operating systems just fine.
I discovered this error because the legacy software would act all strange and be unresponsive as soon as it booted. I tuped CLS in and poof the screed went to a DOS screen.
SO I yanked the USB trackball and keyboard and installed an old style keyboard and mouse.
No change.
I'm thinking I need a legacy mother board too. I have one but no memory for one and no CPU for the other.
Before I try them I'll load Win 95 ( I have a copy of that ) and see if my software will run on the DOS in Win 95. It has before no problem
-